In the News
David J. Bobrow’s expertise and legal victories have been featured in leading publications and media outlets. Stay informed about his recent cases and legal insights.
2 more men charged in relation to deadly 2024 biker gang brawl near Morrill’s Corner
By: EMILY ALLEN | AUG 14, 2025
Maine Capitol Police chief accused of assaulting Hallowell officer after getting into bar fight
By: JIM KEITHLEY | AUG 04, 2025
More than a dozen Mainers charged in Jan. 6 Capitol riot pardoned by Trump
By: RUSS REED | JAN 22, 2025
Portland shooting suspects request changes to bail conditions
By: ALEX HASKELL | JAN 07, 2025
Midcoast builder who defrauded clients of $437K won’t serve prison time
By: JULES WALKUP | OCT 31, 2024
Former KHS club adviser's felony case heads for trial
By: DAYMOND STEER | JUL 04, 2025
Recent Successes
At David J. Bobrow Office of Law, we have participated in over 50 jury trials across three states and three federal courts. We have participated in thousands of more cases where clients have received very favorable resolutions. Some of our very recent success stories are:
State v. M.N.
Client with no criminal history was charged with Domestic Violence Assault. Case involved extensive pre-arraignment discovery and litigation resulting in the matter being dismissed. York County.
State v. L.S.
Matter was set for a jury trial on a first offense OUI. Pretrial litigation surrounded a questionable mouth-check and field sobriety tests, as well as discovery issues. On the scheduled first day of trial, State offered a Driving to Endanger deferred disposition to dismissal which client accepted. Androscoggin County.
United States v. J.P.
Client was among several fishermen charged with conspiracy to commit tax fraud and defraud the United States. Extensive pretrial litigation involved the viability of the charging statute, the actual evidence the United States was seeking to present, and the ability to charge the defendants. Matter proceeded to what was expected to be a two-to-three-week trial. Matter resolved after three days of trial for misdemeanors and no jail sentences.
Commonwealth v. S.S.
Massachusetts client was charged with violation of a restraining order by contacting his ex-wife. The defense involved necessity based on the contact involving children’s issues. Pretrial litigation involved the ability to charge under such circumstances. Case proceeded to trial and dismissed by the Court at the instructions stage.
State v. W.D.
Former corrections officer charged with gross sexual assault and six other charges, including three other felonies based on allegations after a date and sexual encounter. Complaining witness alleged injuries and three expert witnesses testified for the State to corroborate the claimed injuries. Significant pretrial litigation surrounded the introduction of certain evidence and the defense sought medical and counseling records of the complaining witness. Matter went to trial for three days. Jury acquitted of all seven counts.